<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Design Guidelines: Breadcrumbs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.peterpixel.nl/writings/design-guidelines-breadcrumbs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.peterpixel.nl/writings/design-guidelines-breadcrumbs/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:12:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sdfdfgdfgdfg</title>
		<link>http://www.peterpixel.nl/writings/design-guidelines-breadcrumbs/comment-page-1/#comment-12662</link>
		<dc:creator>sdfdfgdfgdfg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 09:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterpixel.nl/writings/design-guidelines-breadcrumbs/#comment-12662</guid>
		<description>sdfsdfsd</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sdfsdfsd</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: im suden</title>
		<link>http://www.peterpixel.nl/writings/design-guidelines-breadcrumbs/comment-page-1/#comment-9586</link>
		<dc:creator>im suden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 08:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterpixel.nl/writings/design-guidelines-breadcrumbs/#comment-9586</guid>
		<description>Alternatively, simply structured sites work well with no navbar and just breadcrumbs: remember, most visitors to sites don&#039;t enter the home page, they use external search or links to a specific article.

Furthermore, research shows (http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20000109.html) that users don&#039;t use navbars.  I personally conclude that the following suffice for navigation within a simple site (such as a blog):

search
logo/text top right linking to the home page
breadcrumb

and, most importantly

links within content, e.g. a link to a similar article or a complete list of articles (which have far more relevance to a user than a universal navbar).

Do users click the navbar links on this site.  I haven&#039;t - I refered to your list of recent articles.  As an experiment, try it on your site.  It&#039;s a bit of a leap, but it works well because breadcrumbs invite readers into reading more relevant content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alternatively, simply structured sites work well with no navbar and just breadcrumbs: remember, most visitors to sites don&#8217;t enter the home page, they use external search or links to a specific article.</p>
<p>Furthermore, research shows (<a href="http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20000109.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20000109.html</a>) that users don&#8217;t use navbars.  I personally conclude that the following suffice for navigation within a simple site (such as a blog):</p>
<p>search<br />
logo/text top right linking to the home page<br />
breadcrumb</p>
<p>and, most importantly</p>
<p>links within content, e.g. a link to a similar article or a complete list of articles (which have far more relevance to a user than a universal navbar).</p>
<p>Do users click the navbar links on this site.  I haven&#8217;t &#8211; I refered to your list of recent articles.  As an experiment, try it on your site.  It&#8217;s a bit of a leap, but it works well because breadcrumbs invite readers into reading more relevant content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alvin</title>
		<link>http://www.peterpixel.nl/writings/design-guidelines-breadcrumbs/comment-page-1/#comment-9234</link>
		<dc:creator>Alvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 22:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterpixel.nl/writings/design-guidelines-breadcrumbs/#comment-9234</guid>
		<description>I would say that you dont need to use breadcrumbs on smaller websites. a simple nav will be ok. breadcrumbs should be used for websites with hundreds of pages with large sections.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would say that you dont need to use breadcrumbs on smaller websites. a simple nav will be ok. breadcrumbs should be used for websites with hundreds of pages with large sections.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.peterpixel.nl/writings/design-guidelines-breadcrumbs/comment-page-1/#comment-8764</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 14:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterpixel.nl/writings/design-guidelines-breadcrumbs/#comment-8764</guid>
		<description>Hi Jermayn, thanks for the comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jermayn, thanks for the comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jermayn Parker</title>
		<link>http://www.peterpixel.nl/writings/design-guidelines-breadcrumbs/comment-page-1/#comment-8741</link>
		<dc:creator>Jermayn Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 00:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterpixel.nl/writings/design-guidelines-breadcrumbs/#comment-8741</guid>
		<description>Good tips, I would suggest and agree with your point that breadcrumbs should be obvious as a link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good tips, I would suggest and agree with your point that breadcrumbs should be obvious as a link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

